Since I'm relatively new to the whole pushing to git thing, I've been intentionally stepping cautiously, running every little patch by you guys, so as not to break anything. I've attached a totally trivial patch, and I'm wondering if you guys would rather I just apply small things like this without asking.
One wrinkle is that compiling and testing things with "make doc"
is (at the moment) out of the question on the computer that I
currently have access to. Which means that I can't definitively
prove that my patches don't break anything, even though in some
cases (like fixing typos) there shouldn't be a problem.
Hopefully this will change soon, but for the moment I'm erring on
the side of caution.
Let me know if you guys would rather have me skip the proofreading
step for trivial patches, but until I hear otherwise, I'll
continue to run them through -devel.
- Mark
0001-Docs-IR-3.2.37-Update-grob-interface-docstring.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
