Hello, I having trouble deciding what to do with this patch I posted a few months ago:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-12/msg00715.html Just to clarify, the renames are: dispatcher --> ly:dispatcher? listener --> ly:listener? There are no other C++ predicate callbacks that have this problem. ________________________________________ Should I make convert-ly rules for them? I'm leaning against it for the following reasons: 1) The chance that someone uses these predicates is *very* slim, since there is minimal interaction with the Dispatcher and Listener classes in LilyPond's Scheme code base. 2) They are documented in IR 4, but since they sit right at the top, many people might consider them anomalies. I remember when I first noticed them, I thought they were bugs in the documentation. :-) 3) They are exported to Scheme, but LilyPond's Scheme code base does not even use them (yet). 4) Convert-ly rules for Scheme-only predicates are non-existent (AFAIK). Does anyone have any thoughts about this? I want to get this taken care of soon, but am (obviously) unsure of how to proceed. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
