On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:09:17PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 04:38:25PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > > Remember that we can set background images in CSS. I recommend > > keeping all such images in css/, and modifying the css file rather > > than the raw texinfo. > > Typically websites inline the branded images so that users with > stylesheets turned off or users with a non-graphical browser will know > that the image is there.
You have a point there. Also, whenever we produce info and pdf, we'd want the logo in there. That part of the patch has been reverted. I guess my basic complaint is that the logo doesn't do anything for me -- a lily pad has nothing to do with notation. I'd be happier if it had something musical in it. > > I've just pushed a change to move the "What is lilypond" box to > > the right. It also has an ugly black background to remind > > everybody that we can do things like that, although it might not > > terrible if it were light gray rather than black. > > I don't see a black background. I see a cropped treble clef though. Err, that's what I meant. An ugly cropped black background treble clef. > Also, I must have missed the reason why you moved the box. I think it > was much more noticeable in its previous location. Really? I thought it merged with the news too easily. I just tried shading the background (like the @warning) and now I think it's better. > Are are any volunteers to continue work on the CSS? I truly hope so, since neither of us are web developers. Furthering my challenge to produce alternate CSS: we now have a default.css and an alt1.css. The alt1.css is what I produced (moving more stuff to the right). Check out the two styles, send in your own, etc. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
