Valentin Villenave <[email protected]> writes: > 2009/7/30 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: >> But if the key signature is, say, G major, then a note f would be >> printed with a natural accidental. So "this rule never prints any >> naturals" would appear wrong to me. > > While the part you quoted is obviously wrong, I think the full > sentence is clear: > "Unlike `dodecaphonic', this rule never prints any naturals. "
Huh? The behavior is unlike `dodecaphonic', but that does not make the second part right. "this rule never prints accidentals consistent with the key signature" or "this rule only ever prints accidentals deviating from/inconsistent with the key signature". -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
