2009/8/3 Joe Neeman <[email protected]>: > On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 01:53 +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: >> 2009/8/1 Joe Neeman <[email protected]>: >> > This comes down to the default value of after-title-spacing in >> > ly/paper-defaults-init.ly, which is clearly way too small. I'd suggest >> > '((space . 10) (padding . 2)) as a starting point. Could you check >> > whether this is default is indeed better (including, perhaps, on scores >> > that are vertically stretched)? >> >> It is much better. Sorry for my lack of understanding of these >> internals, but my question is, why the first system is in a lower >> position when the score is stretched? >> >> Just to be sure, what I mean is: the distance from title to music >> shouldn't be the same regardless of whether ragged-last-bottom=#f or >> =#t ? > > I'm not sure. In the old spacing code, the space between a title and a > system could be stretched, so I preserved that behaviour in the new > code. Would it be better if the space remained fixed? It can be achieved > by adding (stretchability . 0) to after-title-spacing and I'm happy to > add it to the default setting if that's the appropriate behaviour.
Yes, in my humble opinion. A logic that I'll see adequate is: the top of the page has to be good-looking, predictable, similar between different documents, both for crowded pages and for sparse pages; but in case of necessity, if the penalty for spanning onto more one more page is high, this space could be adjusted in a decreasing sense provided that other resorts like between-system space have been exhausted. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
