Mark Polesky wrote: > Hopefully there are no more snafus, but I need you guys to test this. > Let me know if you find any problems. I'd like to apply this if the > developers approve.
In the file attached to the previous post http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-08/txtDIrSYMGg1c.txt one small (but important) correction needs to be made. In the definition for "move-arpeggio-to-this-context", 8 lines down, this line: (let* ((Arpeggio (ly:context-grob-definition context 'Arpeggio)) should instead read: (let* ((Arpeggio (ly:context-grob-definition parent 'Arpeggio)) Thanks to Jonathan Wilkes for catching this (on -user). http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-08/msg00059.html Otherwise, does this look good? - Mark _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
