Le jeudi 06 août 2009 à 13:51 +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer a écrit : > No, big pages should link to the other big pages. That's how the current > .init > file is supposed to work. If it doesn' t, then that' s a bug in the script > and > needs to be fixed.
But does the web site in one large page makes sense? > Why one large file? I thought it should be one large file per manual, with > the > xrefs going between those large files. You think right, IIUC Graham and I never meant anything else. > Or am I misunderstanding what is being said? You 're right in theory, but from a practical point of view, current web-texi2html.init makes big page without navigation bars, and I'm not keen on a web site being on big page, so I just disabled compilation of general.texi in one big page. Maybe we'll be convinced that a big page for the web site is a good site, but then I have no time (i.e. I don't want) to hack any Texi2HTML init file until the rest of the web site and docs infrastructure including translations is in a good shape. Best, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
