On 8/9/09 1:56 PM, "Trevor Daniels" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote Sunday, August 09, 2009 3:36 AM
>
>
>> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 07:21:42PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, I just realized that the inconsistency still exists, even
>> with my
>> patch. Here's an example:
>>
>> \relative c'' {
>> a8 a a a
>> a8 a a a
>> a16 a a8 a a
>> a8 a16 a a8 a
>> a8 a a16 a a8
>> a8 a a a16 a % beaming is different
>> }
>
> Yes, the basic problem still remains. The look-ahead is
> only to the next note. When this is a quaver there is no
> rule which dictates a beam break of quavers at 1/4 and 3/4.
> Fixing this goes rather deeper than the autobeaming rules.
> There is an analogous effect with 16th and 32nd notes:
> try a32 a a16 a a a a32 a a16 a a a a32 a a16 a a a a32 a
>
Could the two of you please take some of these examples and beam them
manually so that I can see what they *should* do? I'll then try to figure
out why the autobeam engraver doesn't do it.
Some explanation as to *why* it should work the way it should would also be
helpful.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
