Neil Puttock <[email protected]> writes:
> I agree, but I think this will have to wait until the chord naming
> code has been reworked since it appears to rely on \hspace having some
> vertical extent for correct positioning.
I'm not aware of this (though I don't doubt that you're right).
Could you give me an example?
>> but I'd also remove the comment above it:
>> ;; todo: fix negative space
>
> It doesn't look as if it's been fixed; it seems to me the problem is
> (cons amount amount) for negative arguments.
It works in the context of a `concat', so I think the problem is some
kind of interaction with `word-space'.
This file illustrates it:
\version "2.13.4"
%% Here the negative hspace works just as expected.
\markup {
\column {
\concat { I I I }
\concat { I \hspace #0.9 I I }
\concat { I \hspace #-0.9 I I }
}
}
%% But the negative hspace here has very little effect.
\markup {
\column {
\line { I I I }
\line { I \hspace #0.9 I I }
\line { I \hspace #-0.9 I I }
}
}
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
