Le 27 août 09 à 22:38, Neil Puttock a écrit :
2009/8/26 Carl Sorensen <[email protected]>:
The patch looks good to me.
Cheers.
You code the empty list as (list). I typically code the empty list
as '().
It there a preference? I suspect that we ought to be consistent,
although
it's not highly important. It could be part of the code janitor
work,
though.
It's just something I noticed in a few places internally (these all
seem to be changes made by Nicolas) and thought it was clearer, though
admittedly I haven't been particularly consistent when deciding
between the two forms. :)
According to R5RS, it is an error to modify a literal list.
If a function returns '(), the caller won't be allowed to
apply a modifying function on the result (eg. append!)
However, guile does not report modifying a literal list as an error,
and actually modifies it, so this is somewhat rhetorical.
nicolas
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
