On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 03:10:53PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote: > > (There are a significant number of files distributed in lilypond which > > are under v2 or later, or v3 or later, as well as things like > > input/mutopia/claop.py, which isn't even Free Software, as it cannot > > be modified.[2]) > > If I'm not mistaken, isn't that file only used for a regression test? > How does that affect the situation?
It's still in the source tree, and thus should be removed before Debian redistributes it. > > I'd personally prefer it if documentation was at least licensed under > > the same license as the code to allow for easily inclusion of code > > examples (and to obviate the problems I [and Debian] have with > > specific aspects of the GFDL.) It certainly can be dual licensed under > > GFDL >= v1.1 + GPL >= v2, though. > > AFAIK the docs have always been GFDLv1.1 -- I don't think we can > unilaterally relicense them. Docs have always been FDLv1.1 or later. I was thinking about unilaterially changing them to FDLv1.3 or later, as soon as I've got GUB working. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
