On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:16:28PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: > The change from 160\mm to 5\in shortens the line > by around 33\mm, which wrecks at least one > example
I have a vague notion that somebody did something to paper definitions and margins, but maybe I'm thinking of Michael's (sp) work which (judging from the PATCH thread) hasn't been committed yet. No... I still think there was something else that *was* committed, in June or July. It was not deliberate to change the docs lnie-width. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
