Graham Percival wrote:
> Please re-read my request. This is not what I asked for.
'As a separate patch, feel free to add the "this manual is under
the FDL" as a comment to the top of any relevant files in
Documentation/.'
I took 'all relevant files' to mean all files in the manual, re-reading
your request I now presume you mean just the top-level file for each
manual ... ?
Is there any particular reason why these per-file license statements are
bad?
Best wishes,
-- Joe
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
