On 2009-10-10, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 01:20:00AM +0200, Christian Hitz wrote: > > Am 09.10.2009 um 21:37 schrieb Graham Percival: > >> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:10:20PM +0200, Christian Hitz wrote: > >> Interesting. What happens if you try 2.12.3 ? That was created > >> with current GUB, but (obviously) 2.12 code. > >> > >> If that succeeds, then we know[1] that the problem is in the main > >> source code; if that fails, then we know[1] that the problem is in > >> GUB. > > > > I tested both 2.12.2 and 2.12.3 on darwin-x86 10.5 and 10.6. > > > > 2.12.2 works on both platforms, 2.12.3 hangs on creating the fonts cache > > on both systems. It works if 2.12.2 has created the cache before. > > Interesting! I suspect that Patrick hasn't been clearing out the > font cache before testing each version. I wonder how far back the > problem goes?
I have been clearing the font cache *every* time, and 2.12.3 and 2.13.6 still work perfectly for me on OSX 10.5. Trust me, I wouldn't report that a certain version works for me had I not been careful about removing the font cache beforehand. -Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
