Le mercredi 04 novembre 2009 à 09:23 +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen a écrit : > Op dinsdag 03-11-2009 om 19:21 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef Graham > Percival: > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:18:50PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote: > > > I agree with this, but I will not responsible for bringing it to > > > reality: putting the main website at the root of lilypond.org will be up > > > to you and Jan. > > I'm not too fond of that idea. Also, it would be nice if the name > of the page were web/bugs [with .LANG.html negotiation] rather > than web/Bugs.
Agreed, but who wants to hack Texi2HTML init files and/or postprocess_html.py? I mean, we have so many other problems that we probably don't want to hack this right now. > >> I guess there will be no particular difficulty doing > >> so, but this might break more old pages URLs than putting the new > >> website in web/. > > Why don't we rename general to web [even a more accurate name?] Because "general" won't show up in the website (splitted HTML output), and it's perfectly accurate for offline docs IMO; for PDF and one-big-page output, well, Graham and me are probably tired by renaming directories :-) Best, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
