Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes:

> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:19:02PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> Op woensdag 11-11-2009 om 17:25 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef Graham
>> Percival:
>> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:12:26PM +0100, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) 
>> > wrote:
>> > > can something be done to make Google display latest doc and not 2.9?
>> > 
>> > It's a known bug in the issue tracker.  Patches appreciated.
>> 
>> Apparently the +v2.12 has been removed again.  It is still present in
>> some of the language directories.
>
> That'll only fix the google search from our site.  If you go to
> google.com and search for "lilypond repeat" (random example), v2.9
> is the first one that comes up.
>
> I *think* that we can add something to robots.txt to tell google
> to stop looking in v2.9  (hmm, maybe it thinks that v2.9 is higher
> than v2.12 ?), but I'd need to spend a few minutes looking it up,
> and this is really far down on the priority list.

But it's a good idea.  Some installers for Lilypond apparently don't
install any kind of information locally, and people just use Google.
Docs that may be behind half a version are bad enough, but being behind
years is worse.

-- 
David Kastrup



_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to