At 06:23 on 13 Nov 2009, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Could it be an option to make <c e g>4*8 do the obvious thing?
> > Or even { <c e g>4 }*8 ?
> > That would be so much more natural. The first already does
> > something, but not something which I would call useful.
>
> I use it all the time, actually.
Me too. Please don't change the meaning of *
> > The second bombs out. In contrast, q feels rather hackish.
>
> Since the patch (as I understand it) ensures that q does not
> duplicate anything except the notes, q allows for
>
> <c e g>8-. q-^ q-. q-^
And indeed:
<c e g>4 q8 q8
which looks extremely useful to me.
--
Mark Knoop
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
