My worry is that this might not work correctly for \tweak #'bound-details #'foo #'bar #22
If that works, please ignore my comment. On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Neil Puttock <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/11/14 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[email protected]>: > >> Shouldnt this be something recursive? I thought properties could nest >> beyond one level. > > I don't see how it can be, unless you mean building the property alist > given the list of symbols and a value to set. > > The problem with the current behaviour is that it's only possible to > use \tweak on something like 'bound-details if you pass the whole > alist, e.g., > > c-\tweak #'bound-details #'(...all subproperties...) \glissando > > Since the current value of 'bound-details isn't accessible at this > stage it's not possible just to override one subproperty: it clears > out all the default values. > > Regards, > Neil > -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [email protected] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
