On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:21 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: >> lilypond a.ly b.ly >> >> we want to reuse the built-in definitions, without changes effected in >> a.ly leaking into the processing of b.ly > > Wouldn't just putting the built-in definition at public scope accomplish > that?
I don't know. Why don't you try it, and send us a patch if it passes the regression tests? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [email protected] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
