On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:53 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > Undocumented code is not maintainable. Throwing it out is a matter of > sanity if it can't get documented, and it apparently can't. It > apparently can't even get questioned or discussed.
We cannot throw out code if that makes LilyPond stop working. Sorry. > How do you suppose that getting new core developers is going to work? I don't know; people like Joe Neeman just show up one day with a large patch that works, is well-thought out, and solves new problems, and they do it without sending endless mail. It has certainly never worked the way you are attempting right now. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [email protected] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
