On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Graham Percival <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:26:06PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On 2010-01-02, John Mandereau wrote: >> > the new website, I don't understand why it's there: the topmost parent >> > section of the page currently viewed is already reachable from the top >> > bar. Therefore, I'm for removing it; however, if somebody gives a good >> > reason for keeping it *and* proposes a nicer name for it e.g. "Up to >> > toplevel section (%s)" % the actual name of up section, I'm glad to >> > either implement it if it takes little time. >> >> I think we should remove it. > > When you're clicked through a few options in a chapter, you've > been staring at the highlighted second-level TOC changing. It's > not obvious how to get back to the first page, if you want to see > the overview of pages in that chapter again. This is a problem in > the old website.
Okay, I see your point. > I'll entertain a renaming (if introduction wasn't already taken, > we could use that; I suppose we could even duplicate the > chapter-name instead of (main)). I've already asked that the > (main) link be the same color+shading as the top navbar, but > that's a CSS issue and not my responsibility. But the actual > second-level TOC item itself is staying. I think that using the chapter name instead of "(main)" would be perfect. I'll take care of the CSS problem tonight. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
