Alexander Kobel schrieb:
[...]
So, what do I think is useful? In the optimum, we should have the
following combinations:
Diving into your proposals, I have some comments:
On a line break:
- "|S" ("|" end of line, "S" begin of line)
- "S|" ("S" only end of line)
Ok.
- "||S" ("||" end of line, "S" begin of line)
Ok, but ... (see below)
- "S||" (vice-versa)
I don't think this is useful - starting a line with a double bar?
- basically the same options for repeats, i.e. ":|S", "S:|", "S|:",
"|:S", ":|S|:", and perhaps even ":|S.|:", where the ":|S" is at the
end of line, and only "|:" at begin of line.
Are you sure about "S:|" and "|:S" ?
"S" should be mapped to either "|S" or "||S" on line breaks - I'd
prefer "||S", since this exactly fits my use of the traditional segno
glyph so far, but that's just personal taste.
I think I'll go for
|S -> | and S
S| -> S and |
S -> || and S (your "||S" example above)
on line breaks.
I hope I can cope with the repeat bar lines/segno combinations in
respect to the span bar lines - let's see.
Marc
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
