Hi all,
I've been lurking a bit on this thread, but felt I should comment.
I personally think we need a more general structure than \repeat will ever be
able to reasonably offer. Essentially, we need to be able to say that a single
movement/piece [of Lilypond code] consists of one or more \section blocks,
where a \section would have at least the following independent options:
1. indent value[s] and/or line lengths;
2. section title (e.g. "Trio").
Then, each section can or cannot include standard Lilypond \repeat structures,
as necessary.
BTW: I'm *not* saying that Lilypond's \repeat structure shouldn't be improved
-- I'm just suggesting that we might be looking at two different problems here.
Cheers,
Kieren.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
