Il giorno mar, 23/03/2010 alle 11.54 +0100, Francisco Vila ha scritto: > Mm, I've thought it twice (8 left) and what it comes to my mind is, > what I push is what I've pulled if the change did not happen in > between. Correct me if I'm wrong. What is the effect of pulling the > new history onto the old one? I bet you can't because it is not > fast-forward.
Oh, you're right, indeed git refused to fetch dev/waf from Savannah after its history rewriting (which I wanted to do to check for changes on this branch I wouldn't have already pushed), so as long as Git pushers don't blindly try to pull/fetch with -f or --force flag, the history replacing will go well, probably with a few complaints on the list. All this doesn't change my answers to Graham's questions, though. Best, John
signature.asc
Description: Questa รจ una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
