Graham Percival wrote:
Jan and I were talking about listing academic papers which cite or
use lilypond, but I soon realized that it wasn't obvious where to
put these. Were they "productions" or "publications" ? If the
latter, how many people would encounter them while they were just
browsing the introduction?
http://lilypond.org/website/productions.html
http://lilypond.org/website/testimonials.html
http://lilypond.org/website/publications.html
After a bit of thought, I'd like to propose condensing these into
three sections, both inside Introduction.
Productions: list of concerts, sheet music, programs using lilypond (as a
backend, not programs to help write lilypond input)
Reviews: published articles about lilypond, and testimonials.
Academia: material which we wrote (including the Essay), and
peer-reviewed articles which cite or use lilypond.
This would also allow us to get rid of the "Backend" section,
which has always been a bit ridiculous.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
- Graham
Got my vote, especially if you read "Backend" as "Background"!
Colin
--
I stay cool and dig all jive, That's the way I stay alive.
My motto, as I live and learn, is "Dig and be dug in return."
- Langston Hughes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
