On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 09:38:03AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: > >> It seems my CG revision caused a little confusion. > >> Should I make the three subsections of CG 3.6 into > >> separate sections? > > > > No, I think that's fine. This should be addressed within > > the Programming chapter by increasing the visibility > > (maybe a @warning, maybe making it a separate section, > > maybe including it in a list of steps for making a patch, > > etc). > > Sorry, I don't follow what you're saying: "increasing the > visibility" of what?
"Increase the visibility" of regression testing. We want code contributors to have no doubt about how to check if their patch(es) break anything, so a link to CG 3.6.3 (possibly with additional explanation and encouragement) should be very visible from somewhere in the programming chapter. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
