On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Nicolas Sceaux <nicolas.sce...@gmail.com> wrote: >> What type signatures would be actually permissable under the assumption >> that they are supported by lexer and parser? >> >> It is somewhat clear to me that we can't have markup-list followed by >> markup in the arguments. Anything else? > > I'd say, a markup-list command signature should follow the pattern: > > scheme* markup* markup-list* > > that is, any number of scheme arguments, then any number of single markup > arguments, then any number of markup-list arguments, even though I don't > know if having several markup list arguments is useful or not (and if it's > doable).
AFAICR the ordering is just there for syntax consistency. If you can make a patch that generalizes markup argument handling like the argument handling for music functions, that would be awesome. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
