On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:19 AM, James Lowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Mark Polesky wrote:
>>
>> Did you guys not see Neil's reply?
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-05/msg00008.html
>>
>> Cross-staff unstemmed tremolos (note the spelling)
>
>> ... look terrible:
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "up" \relative c' {
s1
}
\new Staff = "down" \relative c'' {
\voiceOne
\repeat tremolo 16 {
<a e'>32
{
\change Staff = "up"
\voiceTwo
<cis a'>32
}
}
}
Well, if somebody submitted this bug now, I wouldn't add it as a
@knownissue; I'd just expect it to be added as Defect-medium or
Defect-High. Patrick, could you check if we have such an issue
(potentially at a different priority) ?
> From my own perspective 'look terrible' is rather subjective and do they
> *always* look terrible in all cases or just in the simple example below?
>
> I am happy to put this @knownissue back but '...does not work well' wasn't
> really appropriate or useful to anyone when in fact the example above looked
> pretty OK to me.
I won't object if anybody wants to put the @knownissues back there
(potentially with a different wording), but I think for consistency
with (most) other problems in lilypond, dumping it in the tracker is
best.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
