Matthias Kilian <[email protected]> writes: > I'm not an active musician, and only decades ago I did do music with > others (orchestra, choir), so I may be wrong, but I've a strong > feeling towards `Taktnummern'. It's less ambigous.
There is no point in us inventing new terms, regardless how unambiguous we consider them to be. Really, look closely at the comparatively few Google hits for "Taktnummern". Even among those few (that are orders of magnitudes less than their equivalent in musical contexts, even discounting the "measure amount" hits), the majority is from the Lilypond lists. The usual question is "Welcher Takt?". And a common reply to "Wir fangen nochmal in Takt 13 an" is "Wir haben hier keine Taktzahlen drin." Never heard "Taktnummern" in that context. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
