On 5/27/10 8:15 AM, "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Carl Sorensen <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Benjamin Peterson prepared a patch to fix this issue.
>>
>> It's in the lexer, and I'm not at all comfortable with the lexer. However,
>> the patch has been demonstrated to work and to not break the regtests.
>>
>> Please review this patch.
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/1345041
>
> I think one should try to feed erroneous strings to the includable lexer
> and look at the resulting error messages. That's probably hard to do
> with a regtest (since the regtest is not supposed to produce errors),
> but it would provide some sanity check with regard to the error
> mechanisms tracking the right input.
Would you be willing to do so?
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
