Hi David, > But when trying to hook people on a large scale on Lilypond, you'll find > that there is a reason Lilypond was your tool of choice, and not theirs.
Of course. So the point is simply, how much resource do/can we [the community] spend attempting to lure "the masses"? My guess is, the "sweet spot" -- where a statistically significant group of people will consider Lilypond their "tool of choice", over FinSibEtc -- is far in excess of the community's capacity in the next 3-5 years. > preview-latex has changed my needs for pen and paper for the creation of > quite a bit of mathematical content. At some point of time, a tool > might change your workflow. TeXShop works like a charm for me. > It is not rare for him to produce papers with 1000+ formulae. Sounds like my last "sum of consecutive integer powers" paper. =) > Emacs basically is an editing platform. If you can't warm to its > generic feature set, for a particular application space there might > exist modes and tools that make a decisive difference in usability. True. Kieren. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
