On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Carl Sorensen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/18/10 2:56 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It could be smart to work together with gummi, >> possibly there are better programs than gummi, >> possibly we're better off stealing their technology >> (poppler pdf display) and rolling our own. >> >> What do you think? > > One good thing about doing this is that we could have the application for > both Windows and OSX. > > One bad thing about this is that it will add a new dependency > (python-poppler). > > On the whole, if somebody wants to pursue this, I think it would be a good > feature to add (but I guess it's not available for 2.14 because of > dependency freezing).
Well, I'm not sure if we would want to develop the editor in the same source tree as LilyPond... I think, at least for now, it would be best to work in a separate repo, add the editor to GUB eventually, and see where things go from there. So, in order words, if we keep it in a separate code base, we don't need to worry about the 2.14 dependency freeze. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
