On 2010-07-30 21:51, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 30 July 2010 15:11, Mike Solomon<mike...@ufl.edu> wrote:
This solution works for the minimal example given with the issue, and it
works in general if one accepts the assumption that there is no reason that
anything fed through stack-lines (in scm/stencil.scm) should have an X
extent whose left boundary is anything other than 0. However, I
don'tunderstand lilypond well enough to know:
a) if this is a good assumption
b) if this assumption breaks something else.
You'll probably be interested in Alexander Kobel's patch for this
(http://codereview.appspot.com/1689041/show).
Hi, Mike and Neil,
I just had a quick glance at your mails, and as Neil recognized, I'm
still waiting for a response on my latest patch to fix this issue.
I'm quite satisfied with the solution w.r.t. centering headers, but
there's still room left for further investigation of fill-line, as I
described in the comments to the patch Neil quoted.
Unfortunately, I most probably won't have any spare minute until Aug 09
to care about this piece of code (there's a kind of festival taking
place in my hometown which I help to manage), but feel free to discuss
my code and possible extensions. I'll have a look at it next week.
Cheers,
Alexander
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
