On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:41:19AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> I also made some small changes in the vicinity so someone
> should let me know if this is okay to push.
I'd like some of this patch modified or omitted.
> -...@subheading Other programs can export LilyPond code
> +...@subheading Other programs that can export LilyPond code
This makes it sound as though the previous programs can export
lilypond code. Only Denemo falls into that category; all the
other programs are text editor-types.
Could you just omit this change?
> @item
> -...@uref{http://strasheela.sourceforge.net, Strasheela} is @qq{a
> -highly expressive constraint-based music composition system}.
> +...@uref{http://www.projectabjad.org/,Abjad}, a
> +...@uref{http://www.python.org/,Python} API for Formalized Score
> +Control, @qq{designed to help composers build up complex pieces of
> +LilyPond notation in an iterative and incremental way.}
Hmm. I know that the current entry for Strasheela uses @qq, but
I'd rather avoid that. Could you omit the @qq, or if you want to
totally play by copyright law, ask Trevor (off-list) for
permission to re-use that sentence fragment on our website? Or
just write a new one-sentence description?
> +...@item
> +...@uref{http://strasheela.sourceforge.net,Strasheela}, @qq{a
> +highly expressive constraint-based music composition system.}
While we're at it, could you write a new description for this?
Again, I'd prefer to avoid a @qq unless it's necessary. If not,
I'm happy to do this; I used strasheela for my Masters degree.
The other changes look good.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
