On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:08 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > What's wrong with the following? > moltoF = -\myDynamic "molto_f"
Hi Neil, Duh. Had I thought of that, I might actually not have gone down this road :-) > OK, so this isn't as clean a solution (and might confuse users who don't > understand the distinction between parser keywords and music function > identifiers), but it works fine. It's good enough for things like > \tweak and \bendAfter so why make dynamics a special case? Indeed. However, I think you'll agree with me that it doesn't help make the input syntax consistent: having to choose between postfix and prefix notation, dash- or dashless commands, string arguments that require double quotes, a hash or whatnot. Such discussions surely can (and will) be delayed until GLISS. Looking forward to it, actually ;) In the meantime, I've opened http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1264 Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
