Mark Polesky wrote Saturday, October 09, 2010 4:46 PM
It's not that I want to split hairs; I want to get the new
variable names right the first time. My apologies to any of
you who are getting tired with this process.
:) Yes, thanks! I'm afraid I'm no longer following this
discussion sufficiently carefully to tender sensible
comment, and I wonder if the law of diminishing returns
didn't kick in a couple of variations ago.
Whatever is decided, and the final decision rests with
you and Joe, Mark, the change in the names, together with
the changes to the documentation, are going to result in a
big improvement in 2.14.
I think now it would be better to push the changes, fix
the documentation, and let us try using it to see if any
more tweaks are worth making. It will be much easier to
judge the efficacy when we try using it practically
rather than thinking about it in abstract.
Trevor
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
