Alexander Kobel <n...@a-kobel.de> writes: > On 2010-10-09 17:46, Mark Polesky wrote: >> CURRENT NAME PROPOSED NAME >> ------------ ------------- >> top-system top-system >> top-title top-markup >> between-title markup-markup >> after-title markup-system >> between-system system-system >> before-title system-markup >> bottom-system system-bottom >> between-scores-system score-system > > Huh. Sorry that I missed the weekend discussion; in general I support > these names.
The main problem I see with that naming scheme is that it does not reflect score sheet design, but the current implementation. In the design of score sheets, you arrange titles and scores, with scores having intersystem spacing. That titles are a form of markup is an implementation detail and nothing that describes the layout of a score sheet. That other forms of markup, like top level markup intermissions, don't get spacing parameters different from titles, again is an implementation details inherent in the current code base, but without something like an inherent necessity. So the proposed scheme ties something presented as document spacing parameters into internal details of their implementation. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
