Keith E OHara wrote Tuesday, October 19, 2010 10:34 PM
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:34:05 -0700, Trevor Daniels wrote:
If no one objects soon I shall push it.
James Lowe made comments that you might not have seen yet. I see
where he is coming from, but I hope my answer explained the
purpose of the changes well enough.
Yes, I saw that. That was why I felt a little more text and perhaps
an earlier
example without the tags would help.
(For future reference, please avoid trailing whitespace, and if
possible save the diff or patch with unix line endings - makes
life easier :)
Can do (but with extra steps that I might forget despite best
intentions).
No problem if you forget - it just means extra steps for me :)
I think we need a clearer description about using instrument
definitions in relation to cued notes
I searched, but found no reason to use these features together. I
merely lacked the confidence to suggest removing those sentence
altogether.
I too couldn't see how they helped here. If no one suggests
otherwise I'll simply
remove that sentence. (I have used \instrumentSwitch and
\addInstrumentDefinition
in NR 2.1.6 under Character names. Seems to work well for that.)
Trevor
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
