[email protected] writes: > On 2010/10/22 13:07:27, Mark Polesky wrote: > >> It will be, but that change is beyond me. I'll need to ask >> Joe to do it, but I wanted to clear up everything else that >> I can do on my own first. Besides, I've grown to dislike >> even "base-distance" because it sounds too much like the >> distance between "bases", however that might be >> interpreted.
basic-distance would likely not have that defect. >> Even if that particular thought doesn't occur to a user, it's still >> ambiguous. What do you think about "unstretched-distance"? > > I like it. That seems inappropriate when we are actually seeing a shrink. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
