Re: Tablature: proper support for tie/slur- and tie/glissando-constellations (issue2191042)

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:55:32 -0700 


On 10/28/10 4:50 PM, "Valentin Villenave" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Carl Sorensen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I would *love* to have a way to document Scheme engravers such that we could
>> include them in the docs, but at present I have no knowledge of how to do
>> so.
>> 
>> Can anybody shed any light on this?
> 
> How about basic regrouping all engravers-related Scheme definitions in
> a `define-scheme-engravers.scm' file, and then document it just like
> music-functions.scm and define-markup-commands.scm, using (_
> "localized doc strings"). Or is that too pedestrian?

Well, as far as I can see, Scheme engravers are really engravers, so they
ought to be documented in the IR along with the C++ engravers, not in an
appendix of the NR along with Scheme functions.

Although the approach you suggest is better than having nothing at all.

Thanks,

Carl


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel























					Reply via email to