I've made the changes suggested in the comments. Thanks for the review.
As far as its own section vs. part of unsorted policies -- Graham preferred its own section, so I followed his suggestion. I think that ultimately it will be its own section in the CG, because we'll want to document everything about it, so we might as well start now. New patch set uploaded. Thanks, Carl http://codereview.appspot.com/2933041/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi File Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/2933041/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi#newcode164 Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi:164: @code{liypond-hackers@@gnu.org}. On 2010/11/05 17:47:08, Valentin Villenave wrote:
You're missing an "l".
Done. http://codereview.appspot.com/2933041/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi#newcode169 Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi:169: Subscription to this list is limited to certain trusted developers. On 2010/11/05 17:08:12, Graham Percival wrote:
I'd say "senior" instead of "trusted".
Done. http://codereview.appspot.com/2933041/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
