On 2010/11/14 14:32:48, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:17 PM, <mailto:carl.d.soren...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I don't see how putting the names as variables helps anything.
The
> whole string will need to be translated for localization, rather
than
> doing it one word at a time.
What I meant is that if we ever decide to change the property names again, then it might be more convenient if the old property names weren't hardcoded in the string.
I don't think it's any easier at all. If the property names were to change, we'd do it with a search and replace, and it would get them in the warning string every bit as easily as it would get them in a separate string. If there were a programmatic way to get the property name out of the LilyPond structure, then I could see doing that. But we know the names, and use them to get the data out of the grob structure. Thanks, Carl http://codereview.appspot.com/3100041/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
