On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 08:29:35AM -0000, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Graham Percival Saturday, November 20, 2010 12:44 AM > > >GDP only covered about 30% of the docs, and didn't strictly > >enforce the doc policy even within those areas, that's not a good > >reason to change the policy. > > +1. In the GDP'd parts of the NR there are only 7 exceptions. > (and in vocal none :) > > >Ok, how about saying that you can have > > > >@itemize > >@item foo > >@item bar > >@end itemize > > > >as long as each item is less than a line. > > I'm happy with this
Ok, it's official. > >If there's multiple lines involved, then do the full > > > >@itemize > >@item foo > >far > > No, I don't like this. Too cluttered. Excellent! I hated the look of that, but I was trying to be diplomatic/compromise-ing (hmm, that word has a very different meaning from "compromising") This one is officially out. And if anybody complains, I can point them at you. :) > >or > > > >@itemize > >@item > >foo far > > This is best, but I'd prefer a blank line before and after every > @item > including the first one (IOW after @itemize as well) as long as this > looks OK in info. I'm ok with that. For clarify, you mean "a blank line before every @item, and before the @end itemize". I mean, you don't want @itemize @item foo @item bar @end itemize Who wants to edit the CG for this? James is away for a few days, so there's no point leaving it as a "learn how to use git" exercise. Somebody please edit the CG and push (no reitveld necessary). Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
