On 12/9/10 7:32 AM, "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Carl Sorensen" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:c9200dfc.1824d%[email protected]... > On 12/4/10 11:20 AM, "Carl Sorensen" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> On 12/4/10 11:16 AM, "Carl Sorensen" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 12/4/10 10:51 AM, "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>> >>>>> page-breaking-min-systems-per-page2.log: "warning: compressing music to >>>>> fit" is added. Presumably an intended fix for vertical spacing issues. >>>> >>>> I've now created a web page with the information from my pixel-by-pixel >>>> comparison, including compile times. >>>> >>>> http://www.holmessoft.co.uk/homepage/lilypond/2_13_41/imagediffs.htm >>> >>> If you did a pixel compare on page-breaking-min-systems-per-page2 for the >>> whole image, you'd see that it's much better. The staff that overwrites >>> the >>> tagline in the .40 image is now above the tagline in .41. The change is >>> significant, but it's an improvement, not a regression. >> >> Oops -- I was looking at page3, not page2. >> >> You're right -- this is not good. I'll look into it more. > > It was almost, but not quite, right. > > This regression test should show that if you ask for it, it will put 20 > systems on a page. Half of them overflowed the page in .40. In .41 I > compressed them a bit too high. I've got a new patch that I'll push for > .42. > > Thanks, > > Carl > ========================= > > I _think_ that's fixed it in .42. The staves all just fit on the page, but > the clefs overlap. I presume this is intended behaviour. Yes, it is. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
