Thanks, James! Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/3705042/diff/1/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely File Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/3705042/diff/1/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely#newcode2114 Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely:2114: objects to note heads, if you remove the @code{Note_heads_engraver} I agree with Graham. You either need to change the comma to a semicolon, or add a conjunction like "so". I think it would actually be best to put in a period and make it two sentences. I also think it would be better to reword it as "If the @code{Note_heads_engraver} is removed" http://codereview.appspot.com/3705042/diff/1/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely File Documentation/notation/repeats.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/3705042/diff/1/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely#newcode151 Documentation/notation/repeats.itely:151: of the braces of the grouped notes within an @co...@bs{}alternative} block, otherwise you will not get the expected number of endings. Any bar checks used inside @co...@bs{}alternative} block must be placed in inside the braces of each group of notes.} I think that with the addition of the bar checks to the examples, this warning can be eliminated. The only reason it was needed was because the example we had previously had no bar checks, so a user guessed on where to put them and guessed wrong. http://codereview.appspot.com/3705042/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
