On 12/24/10 9:37 PM, "Keith OHara" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:54:38 -0800, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [...]I would prefer to see the original example retained to show in the
>> starkest
>> fashion how staves should be changed manually, with this one added later
>> to show the possibility of collisions.
>
> That's a better way to do it. The attached patch reverts the original
> example, and is a simple addition of one @lilypond and one paragraph.
>
> Carl started this issue for me, and I think it best to stay on his issue
> number for continuity. Carl will probably upload the patch to his issue for
> me, but we can't expect that to happen too soon.
Oh -- I misunderstood. I'll go ahead and post on Reitveld.
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
