hi all, > As for how to proceed from here, I'm not quite sure, since "my" system > now stands rather outside the normal architecture and its development > process, and since consolidating it further would probably duplicate > some of the work Pál has been doing on the white notation. Probably the > most elegant thing would be if it was possible to merge some of the > logic of my ligature processing (with the plicas, pes shapes and > currentes) into the standard ligature engraver Pál has been improving? > But for that, I'd need somebody to help me with integrating the black > glyph primitives into the standard font system and make them accessible > from the normal engravers. I can't say I've really understood much of > that architecture yet.
I will work on the ligature stuff, but I'm quite slow; regarding other shapes, I have to look very thoroughly through the existing gregorian support and your stuff. What I like best are the Ars subtilior flags; however, that is a part which confuses me quite a bit. In particular, what I've added as coloratio / black mensural notation support is really just the heads, the flagging must be hacked around as I wrote in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-11/msg00212.html regards, p _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
