Keith OHara wrote Wednesday, January 19, 2011 7:25 AM
Follow-up patch attached.
The misleading bit was the implication that the properties always
contain alists, when one of them is by default a function
returning whichever alist is appropriate depending on whether the
staff is in a group.
This patch tells the truth about staff-staff-spacing, and amends
an example to use the simpler default-staff-staff-spacing so that
readers can use the grouped/ungrouped examples in the same file.
This looks fine to me. I'll push it in a day or two if there are no
adverse comments.
Thanks Keith.
Trevor
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
