On 2011/01/23 22:35:02, Neil Puttock wrote:
Sorry Graham, my comment on the regtest should've been clearer: I
wasn't
proposing we add that information to the test (since it only applies
to the new
case fixed by this patch); it's just that the original text is
ambiguous (the
part about two noteheads, since we can only see one in the altered
unison case).

Ok, no problem.  I pushed the modified regtest text, since it certainly
doesn't hurt.

Cheers,
- Graham

http://codereview.appspot.com/4099044/

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to