On 1/26/11, Bernard Hurley <[email protected]> wrote: > The definition of the function "demangle_classname" is the only content > of flower/rtti.cc. This is only referenced in > flower/include/virtual-methods.hh, where it is used in the definition of > the macro "classname". > > Hence the references to "demangle_classname" in virtual-methods.hh can > be deleted along with the file rtti.c > > Of course it is possible that someone may have added them recently with > a view to using them for something, but it looks like historical cruft > to me.
A quick check with both gitk flower/ and the online git browser shows that they are, indeed, "historical cruft". Your patch shows nothing weird with a regtest comparison. I'm building all the docs from scratch right now, and I'll push it once the build finishes and if stuff looks fine. Thanks! Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
